Published last month in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, the report shows that people who know very little about an issue—say the economic downturn, changes in the climate or dwindling fossil fuel reserves—tend to avoid learning more about it. This insulates them in their ignorance—a pattern described by researchers as “motivated avoidance.”
Read the full article here.
Before we chalk up “motivated avoidance” to some innate flaw in the human mind, consider this as well:
“Contrarian scientists, fossil-fuel corporations, conservative think tanks and various front groups have assaulted mainstream climate science and scientists for over two decades,” Dunlap and McCright [sociologists Riley Dunlap of Oklahoma State University and Aaron McCright of Michigan State University] write. “The blows have been struck by a well-funded, highly complex and relatively coordinated denial machine.”
Full article here.
Truth is, “motivated avoidance” isn’t strictly a characteristic of the ignorant; it is a characteristic of the power elite—that “loose affiliation of millionaires and billionaires” Paul Simon sang about in the mid-’80s. (See below.) The elites, of course, have no excuse: they are cynical, narcissistic liars. We’ll know there is progress being made when we hear Rupert Murdoch, for example, referred to on some Sunday talking-head-a-thon as “a cynical, narcissistic, lying media mogul.” A first step, perhaps, toward restoring the connection between language and reality: something poets may want to consider as well.*
__________________
* P.S. Some hours after I queued this to post, I was reading Haruki Murakami‘s extraordinary novel The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle and came upon a passage that gave me pause. I realized that the passage meant I would have to add this postscript and define what I mean by “reality” in the phrase above, “the connection between language and reality.” The passage goes like this: “Everything was intertwined with the complexity of a three-dimensional puzzle—a puzzle in which truth was not necessarily fact and fact not necessarily truth.” The puzzling condition Murakami describes—our human condition—is what I mean by “reality.”
I wish I knew if we have reached a critical juncture. I am convinced we are now in global warming. I saw two robins in my yard, northern Minnesota, end of December! (I've read Robert Graves so I know this is serious!)<br /><br />I might use your article in my classes, though the point of using evidence to convince people who deny evidence that they should pay attention to it might be
This comment has been removed by the author.
Have we hit that iceberg yet, Dale? Some days I think so, some days not….<br /><br />And Jim, I'm with you on trying to know only what counts, with the understanding that we can't really know what counts! My guess is that the human race will pass from the scene without ever cracking the Mystery…. <br /><br />Regarding plastics, I got 60.7 million hits with a search on "recycling
There’s a lot I don’t know about that I probably should. My general line of thinking when it comes to something new is: How much do I really need to know? And I make do with the absolute minimum. A man came earlier today and took away my recycling. I think recycling is a good idea and I’m quite conscientious about it. I put the plastics with the ‘1’ and ‘2’ symbols in the box and throw away the
Interesting, interesting, interesting! The Heartland Institute is a good example of a rightwing "think tank" deliberately promoting confusion and false conclusions on climate change. <br /><br />Someone talks up here in northern Minnesota about how much she is enjoying the warm weather. I cannot help thinking of a similar comment being made on the Titanic: How beautiful that