The Creepy Pseudo-Thought of Languish Poetry


  1. JforJames
    JforJames April 28, 2013 at 7:25 pm .

    The party line has be reaffirmed from time to time. Otherwise they'd forget and backslide. But I always 'ear' on the side of poetry.

  2. Ed Baker
    Ed Baker April 26, 2013 at 1:16 pm .

    lucky stroke, as I<br /><br />just noticed that 124,198 people looked / read this post on your blog ….<br />how many of them actually read the poem and the article …. and got beyond any<br />&#39;enjambment&#39; much less disconnected from boths prescribed / boring &#39;context&#39; and &#39;syntax&#39; ?<br /><br />any / all praxis aside<br />how to just proceed<br />minus the connectives<

  3. Ed Baker
    Ed Baker April 25, 2013 at 7:27 pm .

    This comment has been removed by the author.

  4. awyn
    awyn April 25, 2013 at 11:31 am .

    Harriet has a blue link at the bottom of the page where readers can “report a problem with the poem.” First amusing misperception of the day (I think they meant technical problem). At first I thought the poem was written tongue in cheek, a poet making fun of badly written poetry. His ear essay had me stop reading when he began pontificating about Creeley’s arbitrary, motivated enjambments

  5. vazambam (Vassilis Zambaras)
    vazambam (Vassilis Zambaras) April 25, 2013 at 11:13 am .

    Well, I’ll be—<br /><br />If it ain’t one of them there snow jobs where we’re all supposed to sit tight under a ton of heavy fluff till the next avalanche hits.<br />

  6. Lyle Daggett
    Lyle Daggett April 25, 2013 at 1:31 am .

    Ever notice how much these guys sound like an oil company executive placidly explaining to &quot;news&quot; reporters why dumping thousands of gallons of oil into the ocean isn&#39;t really bad for the environment?

  7. Ed Baker
    Ed Baker April 24, 2013 at 8:27 pm .

    just read K. Silem&#39;s essay …. JEEESH !<br />what the Hell&#39;s Bells he talking about ?<br />and<br />he MEANS to tell me that he understands<br />what he is saying-writing while instead I <br />mostly standsunder and (sort of) do without<br /><br />derigitave terems surrounding set tricks and<br />gimmicks…<br /><br />ZI mean these guys and gals ALL depend upon their<br />definitives

  8. Conrad DiDiodato
    Conrad DiDiodato April 24, 2013 at 4:42 pm .

    Ha, ha

Leave a Reply

nine + sixteen =

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.