Language of the Power Elite

4 Comments

  1. Peter
    Peter May 12, 2013 at 8:27 pm .

    Marjorie’s Valentine <br /><br />All these years poetry<br />having to struggle<br />under the heavy lash<br />of trying to make sense <br />while still keeping<br />musical time which<br />is speech-worthy<br />gregarious and prophetic<br />and now the conceptualists<br />the new nominalists<br />want to plant one half<br />of reality outside reality<br />to widen the gap<br />between rich and

  2. Lyle Daggett
    Lyle Daggett May 11, 2013 at 3:32 am .

    Joseph, thanks for posting this. I followed the link to the Sutherland&#39;s full article, and I&#39;ve linked to it in my blog.

  3. Ed Baker
    Ed Baker May 10, 2013 at 4:58 pm .

    This comment has been removed by the author.

  4. Conrad DiDiodato
    Conrad DiDiodato May 10, 2013 at 1:34 pm .

    &quot;Poetry dismissed by conceptual poets as Romantic, subjective, expressive etc. often does a great deal more of that conceptual work than “conceptual poetry” does.&quot;<br /><br />Hear, hear…<br /><br />Where did the notion arise that a poet, like Rilke or Wordsworth,were intellectual idiots who couldn&#39;t get beyond &#39;emotion&#39;? Ah, probably Perloff and Bernstein.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: