Kent Johnson and the Pros from Dover

4 Comments

  1. Ed Baker
    Ed Baker February 3, 2011 at 3:51 pm .

    my guess is that these Poetry Mavins <br />are<br />NOT commenting<br />is acuse that their lawyers have advised them that they might loose their academic job at university<br /><br />if they put something &quot;out there&quot; for all to see and save<br />for future …..use.<br /><br /><br />is Rich Owens THE Rich Owens of Damn the Caesars?<br /><br />if so,<br /> met him at

  2. Ed Baker
    Ed Baker February 3, 2011 at 3:10 pm .

    you mean-a-tell me that THERE IS a<br /> &quot;Code of Best Poetry Practices&quot;?<br />when the phuch did this happen?<br /><br />OH,<br /><br />((I see (said the blind man))<br /><br />it s a ….nother…&quot;thing&quot; by the <br />National Poetry FoundatiON<br /><br /> … pardon me, but: who THEY!<br /><br />where can i join up with this group &amp;<br />when do they

  3. Kent Johnson
    Kent Johnson February 2, 2011 at 9:12 pm .

    Joe, thanks for this post! Really appreciate it, and I&#39;m sure Rich Owens does, as well. Just a quick but important correction. You write,<br /><br />&gt;Kent rightly wonders why the big-guns lawsuit directed at he and his publisher Richard Owens…<br /><br />instead of &quot;lawsuit&quot; it should be &quot;threats.&quot; No actual lawsuit has been filed. We received strong written

  4. Anonymous
    Anonymous February 2, 2011 at 7:59 pm .

    kent&#39;s &quot;case&quot; is utterly uncorroborated. and kent is known for hoaxes. no one believes that he&#39;s been threatened (for good reason), which is why you don&#39;t see &quot;big guns&quot; commenting on it.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: